Common Identity Infrastructure
Common Identity Infrastructure.
So we're getting ready for the PlanetWork Conference and a collabotory on the ASN (Augmented Soical Network) idea. In preparation for that Drummond Reed posted this bit.....
What we are trying to do is create a "common identity infrastructure" - the third major layer in the evolution of the net. The first layer - the Internet itself - is a "common networking infrastructure", a way of linking any two devices on any two networks so that they could exchange packets with each other. The second layer - the Web - is a "common document infrastructure", a way of linking any two documents on any two websites so they can exchange pointers with each other.
The third layer is not about machines and packets or documents and websites but people and organizations. That's why it fits so neatly under the rubric of "social protocols". A common identity infrastructure is a way of linking any two people or organizations in any two communities so they can share data with each other.
So if what was needed for the first layer was common protocols for packet exchange and a network of gateways and routers that implemented them, and what was needed for the second layer was common protocols for network hypertext and a network of web servers and web browsers that implemented them, then what is needed for the third layer is common protocols for data sharing and a network of data sharing servers and clients that implement them.
That's what XRI and XDI are all about. Thus, from my perspective, what is needed to deliver the ASN is a network of XDI servers and clients and that start linking up with XDI data sharing contracts. The result will be a web of identities and relationships similar to today's Web of documents and hyperlinks.
I should add one other thing, which is governance. At each layer, as Owen Davis points out in his thread, there is a need for at least some minimal form of governance for the "commons". Since the first layer was almost purely technical, the IETF supplied the governance of the "network commons". For the second layer, the W3C and ICANN (two more self-organized entities) have provided the governance of the "document commons".
Now we are facing the question of who will supply the governance for the third layer. In terms of the technical protocols, that's why XNSORG was created . But as Owen Davis points out, once you move to the level of social protocols, you need some minimal form of governance of the "identity commons" - the social and business agreements that govern data sharing using the technical protocols. That's why Identity Commons was created.
(BTW, it's fascinating to me that the creators of XNSORG and the creators of Identity Commons started completely independently and did not meet each other until well after their respective efforts were launched. To me its proof of the real social and market needs that both organizations were created to help fill.)
=Drummond Reed [Marc's Voice]
6:16:23 AM
|