Coyote Gulch

 



















































































Subscribe to "Coyote Gulch" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

e-mail John: Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  Wednesday, December 8, 2004



9/11 Intelligence Reform Bill

Wired: "But the 615-page bill contains a number of other provisions that vex some civil liberties groups. The bill includes a $40 million dollar proposal for a far-reaching government information-sharing network intended to radically expand the availability of intelligence data across agencies. The system would allow counterterrorism investigators to instantly query a massive system of interconnected commercial and government databases, which hold billions of records on Americans. The bill also would impose national standards for drivers' licenses and birth certificates, expand the government's wiretap powers and provide funding for research into national biometric identity cards. To offset these changes, the bill creates a civil liberties board."

Update: Western Democrat: "By my count, 20 out of the 67 Republicans that voted against the Intelligence Bill yesterday were from the West. They supposedly voted against the bill because it lacked anti-immigration provisions that were apposed by the White House and, seemingly, Democrats."

Update: 5280 Weblog: "Democrats Diana DeGette and Mark Udall voted Yes. So did Republicans Bob Beauprez and Marilyn Musgrave. Those opposing the measure were Republicans Tom Tancredo, Scott McInnis and Joel Hefley."
6:59:20 AM     



Happy Hanukkah

Ed Cone: "It does fit into the general rubric of Jewish holidays: They tried to kill us all but failed, let's eat."
6:51:24 AM     



Liberals and the War on Terror

TalkLeft: "A good read today is journalist and Oricinus author David Neiwert's response to Peter Beinert's article in the New Republic on why liberals don't support the War on Terror."

Sunday Herald: "The Pentagon has admitted that the war on terror and the invasion and occupation of Iraq have increased support for al-Qaeda, made ordinary Muslims hate the US and caused a global backlash against America because of the 'self-serving hypocrisy' of George W Bush's administration over the Middle East. The mea culpa is contained in a shockingly frank 'strategic communications' report, written this autumn by the Defence Science Board for Pentagon supremo Donald Rumsfeld."
6:40:52 AM     



2004 Presidential Transition

J. Stephen Grilles, a pro-development Deputy Secretary of Interior, resigned Wednesday, according to the Denver Post [December 8, 2004, "Controversial Interior deputy leaving post"]. From the article, "J. Steven Griles, the Interior Department's controversial deputy secretary who favored aggressive energy development in the West and became the subject of an ethics probe, submitted his resignation Tuesday. A former energy industry lobbyist, Griles underscored in his letter to President Bush his philosophy of considering business interests when regulating use of 507 million acres of national parkland."

Matthew Gross has this to say of Grilles departure, "Good riddance. One only hopes the coins falling out of his pockets don't jam the revolving door between industry and government." Ouch.

Blogs for Bush: "We hold it a self-evident truth, as Americans, that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed - that the government may do nothing that we do not ultimately empower them to do. I don't recall any agreement from we Americans that we had assigned the right to decide contentious issues to un-elected judges - yet this, essentially, is what a great many judges have done over the past 50 years. The Roe decision is just the most bald usurpation of the rights of Americans to determine their own laws - but there have been literally hundreds of cases, great and small, which have chipped away at our rights to determine for ourselves what laws we shall live under."

Taegan Goddard: "It was the issue virtually ignored during the election campaign. Now the New York Times says 'the Washington establishment is gearing up for the battle over the Supreme Court. Justice Rehnquist has not announced plans to retire, but advocacy groups on both sides are already raising money and plotting strategy either to support or to oppose whoever is nominated to be his replacement. The result is an awkward wait for a conflict that both sides expect will be as bitter and divisive as the presidential election itself.'"

Wired: "A study by Berkeley grad students and a professor showing anomalies with electronic-voting machines in Florida has been debunked by numerous academics who say the students used a faulty equation to reach their results and should never have released the study before getting it peer-reviewed. The study, released three weeks ago by seven graduate students from the University of California, Berkeley's Quantitative Methods Research Team and sociology professor Michael Hout, presented analysis showing a discrepancy in the number of votes Bush received in counties that used touch-screen voting machines versus counties that used other types of voting equipment."

Update: It looks like John Snow will be hanging with the President for a while yet.

Update: Josh Marshall: "Principi out at VA."

Update: Here's the transcript of Howard Dean's speech given at The George Washington University on December 8, 2004. Dean's strategy? "Our challenge today is not to re-hash what has happened, but to look forward, to make the Democratic Party a 50-state party again, and, most importantly, to win."
6:32:48 AM     



Colordo Water

Colorado will not have to pay Kansas some $24 million in interest charges stemming from overuse of the water in the Arkansas River, according to the Rocky Mountain News [December 8, 2004, "Colorado wins water ruling over Kansas"]. From the article, "Colorado scored a key, $24 million legal victory Tuesday when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the state would not have to pay interest costs to Kansas to settle a 20-year dispute over the Arkansas River. Kansas had asked that Colorado pay a total of $53 million to cover damages suffered as a result of Colorado's overuse of the river from the 1950s to the early 1990s. History of the feud: 1900s - Kansas accuses Colorado of drying up water supplies Kansas farmers need; 1949 - Congress passes interstate compact, dividing the water among the states; 1970 to 1985 - Kansas accuses Colorado of taking too much water; 1985 - Kansas sues Colorado; 1995 - U.S. Supreme Court rules for Kansas, saying Colorado took too much water; 2001 - Court says Colorado owes $29 million. Kansas asks for $24 million more in interest; Dec. 7, 2004 - Court says Colorado doesn't owe interest, but does owe the $29 million."

Here's the coverage from the Denver Post [December 8, 2004, "State must pay Kan. $29 million"]. They write, "A tributary of the Mississippi, the Arkansas flows 1,450 miles east and southeast through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma and Arkansas. Kansas and Colorado officials have fought for more than a century over the river's water and first took their case to the Supreme Court in 1902."
6:28:44 AM     



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2009 John Orr.
Last update: 3/14/09; 7:13:56 PM.

December 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Nov   Jan

Google


e-mail John: Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.