Talking Points Memo: "House votes to condemn escalation, 246-182, with 17 Republicans defecting to join Dems against 'surge.'"
The Gavel: "Statements on passage."
Whitehouse.gov: "The House of Representatives has passed a resolution expressing disapproval of President Bush's plan to send reinforcements to Iraq. This plan enjoys the support of the Iraqi government and U.S. military leadership, including Gen. David Petraeus, Commander of the Multi-National Force in Iraq, who recently was confirmed to his post by an 81-0 vote in the Senate.
"The President ordered a new way forward in Iraq because he, like most Americans, believed the existing situation in Iraq was unacceptable. The President concluded that this new strategy was necessary in order to help the Iraqi government gain control over Baghdad, assume more responsibility for security, and pursue reconciliation of all of Iraq's communities.
"The resolution is nonbinding. Soon, Congress will have the opportunity to show its support for the troops in Iraq by funding the supplemental appropriations request the President has submitted, and which our men and women in combat are counting on.
The Onion: "President Bush announced Monday that his administration will permanently sever ties with the democratically controlled United States Congress, ending a nearly 220-year-old alliance between the two governmental branches." Thanks to the Daily Kos for the link.
Captain's Quarters: "With all of the focus on Baghdad and the surge, the second portion of the President's new strategy has gotten little attention. Four thousand Marines have begun arriving in Anbar, the power base for al-Qaeda in Iraq, in order to clear the province of these terrorists. They may find their job a little easier than first thought, as the savagery of AQI has turned many tribal leaders against the extremists."
Blogs for Bush: "I am so tired of people playing politics with war. This is exactly what I mean about people who won't stand for anything. They are useless. If the people who oppose the troop surge really want to take a stand, why don't they take a stand that means something. This is not only a waste of time and a bad idea, but it's downright silly. Why? That's my question. Why? Why would you authorize the Commander-in-Chief of your country to use force against those who threaten democracy and freedom in the world and then take away his means by which to use it?"
"2008 pres"
7:58:17 AM
|