| |
|
Friday, February 23, 2007
|
|
Oliver Willis: "Allow me to deviate from what is apparently the emerging consensus that the dust up between Obama and Clinton is a bad thing. First of all, nobody in the real world cares. People aren't paying attention to the political machinations this far out ahead of time, no matter how much the media, the pols, and the political junkies like myself are. It has no impact on the general election.
"But it has been a long time since the Democrats had a real fight for the nomination..."
Captain's Quarters: "The eruption of hostilities between the Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama campaigns this week potentially creates an opening for another candidate to exploit to match or best the two front-runners. Josh Gerstein makes the case that John Edwards will gain the most traction from a Hillary-Barack feud..."
"2008 pres"
6:21:54 AM 
|
|
Stars and Stripes: "Nine months ago, the brigade moved from Tal Afar in northern Iraq to Ramadi, home to two-thirds of the population of Iraq's largest province, Anbar. The city was an insurgent stronghold that, MacFarland said, al-Qaida had decided to make the 'capital of al-Qaidastan.' But his brigade, with no small measure of assistance from local sheiks -- in particular Sheikh Abdul Sattar -- turned the tide in the city in nine months. The stalemate there, which was widely reported after the leak of a classified Marine intelligence report in September, is broken, MacFarland said. By reaching out to local sheiks for advice, driving out al-Qaida-linked terrorists and staying in the city to keep it safe afterward, the brigade got the population -- almost exclusively Sunni Arabs -- to join U.S. forces in battling the insurgency, MacFarland said. Now, 'If you talk to these sheiks, they'll tell you that they're in no hurry to see the Americans leave al-Anbar,' he said."
Thanks to Blogs for Bush for the link.
Josh Marshall is linking video of an interview with Barack Obama prior to the U.S. invading Iraq. We're sure the the Senator would approve.
Josh Marshall: "This looks like a critically important piece just out from Michael Hirsh in Newsweek. The quick summary: the implications of the 'surge' policy aren't at all understood at all in the US political conversation. The 'surge' isn't a ramped up effort to get a hold of the security situation in Iraq so that American troops can come home. The whole policy is based on the assumption that Iraqis can't police or stabilize Iraq, that the American military will have to do it for them and that we'll be there for five or more likely ten or more years more before we have any hope of leaving."
Political Wire: "'A train wreck.' -- Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), quoted by ABC News, describing President Bush's initial pursuit of the Iraq War."
The Gavel: "A New York Times story today details Pentagon plans to send National Guard troops back to Iraq next year without standard time between deployments in order to sustain President Bush's plans for escalation in Iraq. The latter part of the article gives specifics on shortcomings regarding training, equipment, and time at home."
"2008 pres"
5:59:39 AM
|
|
Governor Ritter is following up on his promise to promote renewable energy in Colorado by supporting a bill winding it's way through the legislature, according to the Summit Daily News "reg". From the article, "Raising the state's standards for electricity produced by renewable energy will create thousands of new jobs and increase Colorado's gross domestic product by nearly $2 billion, Gov. Bill Ritter said Thursday. Ritter cited a study by the Environment Colorado predicting that the state would see 4,100 new jobs, $570 million more in wages and $1.9 billion more in gross domestic product if it doubled the minimum amount of electricity its utilities generate from renewable energy -- the goal of a bill now before the Legislature. The bill, which would require utilities to generate 20 percent of their electric power from renewables by 2020, would also save 18 billion gallons of water that would otherwise be used to cool coal- and gas-fueled turbines, the environmental coalition study said."
"2008 pres"
5:33:40 AM
|
|
Here's an opinion piece about habitat for endangered species, written by former state senator Dan Grossman, from the Denver Post. From the article, "The new Congress that took office last month has a chance to marry Republican predilections for cutting taxes with Democratic aspirations for protecting the environment. For too long, conservation of wildlife and natural resources has pitted farmers, ranchers and forest landowners against environmentalists. However, increasingly both sides recognize the importance of using economic incentives, not just regulation, to encourage land stewardship and the resulting protection of wildlife, clean water and natural areas. There already are signs that members of both parties recognize the opportunity to help landowners and the environment by offering significant tax incentives to achieve meaningful conservation.
"Most rare species are found on private lands and their conservation often requires habitat restoration or takes protective and often costly measures. Next week, Sens. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., and Ken Salazar, D-Colo., are expected to introduce a bill that awards tax credits to landowners who agree to manage their land to benefit the 1,200 endangered species nationwide and 32 endangered species in Colorado, including the greenback cutthroat trout. Significantly, they were joined by Sens. Max Baucus, D-Mont., and Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, who are the chairman and ranking member of the Finance Committee. With that sort of backing, the bill will surely get the committee's attention...
"2008 pres"
5:14:58 AM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2009 John Orr.
Last update: 3/15/09; 12:37:55 PM.
|
|
|
