101 - 365 (baby!)
a blog of truth and beauty
        

Home
Index
About
Gallery

p e r i o d i c
Buy Images!

The 'Hood
jenett.radio.randomizer - click to visit a random Radio weblog - for information, contact randomizer@coolstop.com

Art

Science

Computer

Tools

Auf Deutsch

Celebrity

Discussion

Personal

Moved On...

Other Chris Heilmen

Listed on
BlogShares
Google: chris 101
<# phx blogs ?>
Hot or not?
Hire me!
Geo
jenett.radio.randomizer - click to visit a random Radio weblog - for information, contact randomizer@coolstop.com


October 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Sep   Nov

Click to see the XML version of this web page. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

Wednesday, October 1, 2003

Cobb calls the California recall election for Schwarzenegger, no doubt influenced by the LA Times poll released today giving Arnold 56 percent of the vote.
comments


Aggregated feeds from Bloggercon attendees. [from Scripting.com]

I am #36 on the waiting list where I work to get funding for conference registration and #7 to receive travel money. Since it begins day after tomorrow, I doubt they will get down to me by then. The short of it: I will not be able to attend Bloggercon this year. <sidefrowney>

comments


This website has no words for the California recall. [from Language Removal Services via NPR]

(Vocal cords picture from Language Removal's website)
comments



comments


The extraordinary blog, gammatron (phase ii), points to Martine Nida-Rümelin 's essay:

Pseudonormal Vision and Color Qualia

I always flash back on the cult movie, Dark Star, whenever I encounter phenomenology. The same classic theme is explored here, "does the world inside the mind reflect measurable external quantities, or not?" Dr. Nida-Rümelin's argument, at least in the case of inverted colors, pushes us to the 'not' side - a conclusion that comforts me.

I have some issues with some of the color perception arguments though.

"... one should keep in mind that these labels derive from "blue" (in the case of B-cones), "green" (in the case of G-Cones) and "red" (in the case of R-Cones). These three cone types contain in normal people three chemically different photopigments. The photopigment contained in a receptor determines its characteristic sensitivity to light of different wavelengths. This assumption is central to the following discussion. It implies that a G-cone will react to a specific light stimulus exactly like a normal R-cone if it is filled with the photopigment normally contained in R-cones and vice versa. "
This seems to presuppose that the functionality of each individual sensor is hardwired into the optic signal that is sent from the eye to the brain. It isn't.
"If a creature sees neither reddishness nor yellowishness in a perceived color, then this constitutes, as Hardin says, its failing to see orange. The same point may be put in another way: Being composed of red and yellow is not just an actual but rather a necessary property of orange. "
What about mixing yellowish and blue-greenish? Might not some color you could call orange come out? I think so.
"A creature who has visual experiences that realize the phenomenal structure (Sp) necessarily has experiences of red, green, blue, and yellow. "
Or maybe, RGBY are primary colors only because of several millennia of artistic sensibilities?


comments

© Copyright 2003 by Chris Heilman.