Seb's Open Research
Pointers and thoughts on the evolution of knowledge sharing
and social software, collected by Sébastien Paquet

Webfeed (?)
email me


Home
Introduction
My keywords
My popular pieces
Stories and articles
2002 weekly archives
2003 weekly archives
2004 weekly archives
Neighborhood tour
Technorati cosmos
Blogstreet profile
Today's referers
Seb's home


My other weblogs:
Many-to-Many: Social Software groupblog
My public mailbox
My 'Quantum Bits' blog
En français SVP!


Topicroll:
Montreal, QC
Syndication
Musiclogging
Group-forming
Social Software
Augmented Social Net
Emergent Democracy
New webloggers
TopicExchange
Edblogging
KMPings
Wiki


Communities:
open-education
SocialSoftwareAlliance
Research Blogs
group-forming
Ryze
K-Logs
IAWiki
KmWiki
Ko4ting
Meatball
ThinkCycle
Kairosnews
ShouldExist
PhDweblogs
infoAnarchy
RSS MEETUP
Minciu Sodas
First Monday
Blog MEETUP
missingmatter
ThoughtStorms
ConstellationW3
AmSci E-Prints
Weblog Kitchen
Knowledge Board
Weblogs at Harvard
EduBlogging Network
NewCivilizationNetwork
Reputations Research
Transdisciplinarity
Know-How Wiki
PlanetMath
LoveBlog
YULBlog


Teams:
 
Flickr
StreamLine
JC Perreault
SocialDynamX
Smart Mobs
Socialtext
Blue Oxen
OpenFlows
Fleabyte
Idéactif
iXmédia
Thot
Edge
sosoblog
Web Tools- Learning
OpenAccessScholarship


People:
 
with a weblog


Spike Hall
Chris Dent
John Baez
Bill Tozier
Erik Duval
Clay Shirky
Jill Walker
Jim McGee
David Tosh
danah boyd
Sylvie Noël
John Taylor



Ton Zijlstra
Joseph Hart
Ed Bilodeau
Peter Suber
David Deutsch
David Brake
Steve Cayzer
Lilia Efimova
Mark Hemphill
Alex Halavais
Mike Axelrod
Paul Resnick
Cosma Shalizi
Andrew Odlyzko
Lance Fortnow
Tom Munnecke
Henk Ellermann
Mark Bernstein
Jeremy Hiebert
Jacques Distler
Michael Nielsen
Thomas N. Burg
Hassan Masum
Ian Glendinning
Marc Eisenstadt
George Siemens
Howard Rheingold
Stephen Downes
John Bethencourt
Sebastian Fiedler
Kevin Schofield
José Luis Orihuela
Martin Terre Blanche
Elizabeth Lane Lawley
Paul Cox
Jon Udell
Don Park
*Alf Eaton
Lion Kimbro
Phil Wolff
Jay Cross
Julian Elvé
Matt Webb
Adina Levin
*Marc Canter
Matt Mower
Kevin Kelly
Dina Mehta
Greg Searle
Ross Dawson
Al Delgado
Rajesh Jain
Lee Bryant
Jesse Hirsh
David Sifry
Jeff Bridges
Stowe Boyd
Walter Chaw
Piers Young
Barbara Ray
Dave Pollard
Ian McKellen
Josep Cavallé
Hylton Jolliffe
Lucas Gonze
Jerry Michalski
Chris Corrigan
Boris Anthony
Michael Fagan
Mary Messall
Denham Grey
*Ross Mayfield
*Phillip Pearson
Whiskey River
David Gurteen
Tom Portante
Chris Wenham
Pierre Omidyar
Stuart Henshall
Greg Costikyan
David Gammel
Renee Hopkins

Peter Van Dijk
Peter Lindberg
Michael Balzary
Steven Johnson
Robert Paterson
Eugene Eric Kim
Jason Lefkowitz
*Flemming Funch
Bernie DeKoven
Edward De Bono
Maciej Ceglowski
Charles Cameron
Christopher Allen
*Philippe Beaudoin
Richard MacManus
The Homeless Guy
Ward Cunningham
Hossein Derakhshan
Stewart Butterfield
Stefano Mazzocchi
Evan Henshaw-Plath
Gary Lawrence Murphy
Karl Dubost
*Dolores Tam
Norbert Viau
Patrick Plante
Daniel Lemay
Sylvain Carle
Bertrand Paquet - Hydro-Québec
Michel Dumais
Mario Asselin
Robert Grégoire
Roberto Gauvin
Clément Laberge
Stéphane Allaire
Gilles Beauchamp
Jean-Luc Raymond
 
without a weblog
Steve Lawrence
Simon B. Shum
Stevan Harnad
Brian Martin
John Suler
Christopher Alexander
Johanne Saint-Charles
Douglas Hofstadter
John Seely Brown
Murray Gell-Mann
Steve Newcomb
Howard Gardner
Anthony Judge
Patrick Lambe
Donald Knuth
Phil Agre
Jim Pitman
Chris Kimble
Peter Russell
Roger Schank
Howard Bloom
John McCarthy
John C. Thomas
Doug Engelbart
Seymour Papert
Hossein Arsham
W. Brian Arthur
N. David Mermin
Tommaso Toffoli
 
offline
Brian Eno
Will Wright
Jean Leloup
Daniel Boucher
Daniel Bélanger
Laurence J. Peter
Plume Latraverse
 
dead
George Pólya
Thomas Kuhn
Edsger Dijkstra
Hermann Hesse
Abraham Maslow
Benjamin Franklin
Shiyali Ranganathan
Andrey Kolmogorov
Jiddu Krishnamurti
Georges Brassens
Bertrand Russell
Astor Piazzolla
Kurt Cobain
Socrates


Resources:
Google Search
Fagan Finder Blogs


Googlism
Google Glossary
Dictionary.com
Thesaurus.com
WordNet


NEC ResearchIndex
arXiv.org e-prints
SEP Bibliography
citebase search


Complexity Digest
Principia Cybernetica


All Consuming
Audioscrobbler
gnod musicmap
Logical Fallacies
W3C Link Checker
Wayback Machine
RemindMe Service


Music streams:
Radio Tango Argentino
Boombastic Radio
secret-sound-service
Limbik Frequencies
Radio Paradise
lounge-radio
Magnatune
Accuradio
Phishcast
SomaFM
WeFunk
kohina
KPIG
shoutcast streams
electronic streams index


Quotes


Subscribe with Bloglines





Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

Friday, September 06, 2002
 


Passing Humanity. Here's a little piece I wrote about a game-like thing I do when I go for a walk. I thought I'd share and maybe you'd share back. I'd really like to collect some of the strategies people use to establish friendly eye-contact with passing strangers. [DeepFUN Weblog via Ron Lusk's Radio Weblog]

The comments to the piece are also worth reading.


What do you think? []  links to this post    11:36:07 AM  
Collectively blogging a quantum computing conference?

OK, so it looks like there's a window of opportunity to get a little weblogging going in the quantum computing research community. A research team I'm part of has connections to the organizers of the upcoming workshop on quantum information processing at Berkeley. I'm told they're open to experimenting with new forms of knowledge sharing. The workshop could serve as a launchpad for a permanent virtual blog-enabled conference.

While I'm not overly optimistic about participation rates, here's what I'm thinking. I could try to write a little document that explains how blogging enables high-signal informal conversations and how this differs from using a mailing list, point to good examples of such conversations, and asks interested participants to each set up a personal weblog to discuss what goes on at the workshop or whatever else they feel like talking about. I think I'd point them to blogger because it's so easy to set up and use.

I could also put up a wiki to let the initiative self-organize; one page would collect links to participating webloggers and their blogs so they can find one another. Perhaps other pages could come in handy as billboards. I should arrange for the main web page for the workshop to point to the wiki, so people can find it. People who can't be there would also be encouraged to participate in the conversations.

I believe the main obstacles would be shyness, unfamiliarity, and the fact that people are already there so it's obviously easier to speak to them directly. But perhaps a few people (weakly connected students?) will try it anyway, just for kicks.

Obviously most of the value in this initiative would actually be in the conversations and relationships that will hopefully continue to flourish well after the conference is over, as everyone still has their blog.

Any suggestions? Could this work? I'm not sure. So far I've only found one quantum blogger out there, so this is probably going to be new and foreign to almost everyone. But hey, gotta start somewhere.


What do you think? []  links to this post    9:32:39 AM  


KM Wiki maintains an evolving list of information sources on knowledge management. The idea of sorting them "in order of originality, consistency and KM focus" is great. I encourage anyone who puts lists online to order the items. However subjective that order may be, it's still more informative than random order.
What do you think? []  links to this post    8:37:41 AM  
Blogging, scientists, humanists, and complexity

Stephen over at Blogging Alone mentions Sébastien Paquet's reasons why blogging has failed to become a widely accepted research tool among academia. I disagree with nearly all of these reasons. Below is the list of reasons and my thoughts based on my own experiences:

1. It takes time.
All research and information sharing takes time, but yet it continues in so many ways. I know very few research scholars unwilling to do anything simply because it 'takes time'
2. The technology is not well-established and tested at this point.
Since when is Blogging a technology heavy solution? It is more a social phenomenon and paradigm shift that in the end will be technology agnostic.
3. Many people don't like being among the first ones doing something.
Silly, silly, silly. This is a population-general statement and does not support the hypothesis regarding research and academia.
4. Not all scholars are used to the Web and hypertext.
I would say that most scholars are. This is no longer 1994.
5. Shyness and fear of public mistakes.
We are talking about scholars aren't we?
6. Many scholars won't write unless they have to.
The scholars I know, all they do is write, that is how they communicate.
7. They may especially be reluctant to publicly expose ideas that they haven't tested.
A huge vast majority of scholarly ideas are untested - especially within the social sciences. Scholars within the social sciences have the most to benefit from a Blog culture - it will provide them another forum in which to expose ideas outside the circle of pure scholars.
8. Fear that someone else will pick up their ideas and work them out before they do.
This is a legitimate reason. [Superfluous Man]

I think this reply and this earlier one highlight the cultural difference between the social sciences and "science" that would be worth exploring. I have a "science" background. In this world, it would seem that there is more pressure for conformity. People are much more concerned about making mistakes in public and about doing things in non-traditional ways. For instance, it is far easier to publish work that follows a time-honored template, even when the template is arguably inadequate for the problem at hand, than to push forth an innovative methodology.

Perhaps you could put it this way: scientists think of themselves as producers of reliable results, while social scientists see themselves as producers of tentative ideas. But this is an overgeneralization. Many theoreticians such as physicist David Mermin produce (very interesting) ideas, not results.

I think the difference boils down to whether you're working inside a paradigm (what Kuhn calls normal science) or are busy trying to work out appropriate paradigms for a particular object of study. The latter kind of people spend little time in a lab and more time arguing, so maybe they're better prepared for blogging.

But as science is increasingly diving into complex problems, growing numbers of scientists question the adequacy of the dominant paradigm or methodology in their particular discipline. Scientists gone meta. Third cultureThose oddballs are the ones I expect to start blogging. (By the way, if you're reading this, somehow recognize yourself and haven't yet started blogging, now is a perfect time to begin.)

By the way, googling for "normal science" I found this really interesting page on post-normal science which suggests a possible middle ground between the labcoats and the latte drinkers. The business world in some ways would look like the most fertile soil for such a brand of science. Don't you think?


What do you think? []  links to this post    8:21:30 AM  


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. Copyleft 2006 Sebastien Paquet.
Last update: 4/22/2006; 12:03:52 PM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme.

September 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Aug   Oct





Syndicated content: