-- Comment() Dnevin asked: "If you scaled the number of G5 processors to equal that of earth simulator would the bigger G5 cluster approach or surpass the current number 1? Or would bandwidth, overhead issues kill cpu / linear peformance?" Here is my reply: I believe the current Infiniband hardware is optimized for the 2200 cpus in the system. To increase the number of processors, you would have to improve the communication hardware significantly.So, you could build a G5 system surpasing Earth simulator, but the price could exceed $20 million. (But the price would be extremely cheap in comparison.)
|
Over 2000 readers in a day... -- Comment() This is a new record (I believe) for this weblog. My story about Apple G5 dual supercluster has generated a lot of traffic, apparently. I slightly updated the text today. I also noticed some benchmark results of MVAPICH. Rob Barris commented on the huge power consumption estimate: "I would not be surprised if a large fraction of the difference is accounted for by the external cooling machinery - compressors to make cold water for distribution are likely power hogs (as most refrigerators are)." Thanks for this insight. However, isn't this a case of moving heat from one place to another, and thus not too expensive? Of course, this depends on the actual mechanism which is used, and the system at Virginia Tech may well be rather inefficient.
|
-- Comment() PC Magazine: Five Stars For Panther: "PC Mag gave the big black cat a five out of five star rating. I really like Panther, but I never would have imagined that this would happen. Pretty cool. PC users take note!"
|
-- Comment() I noticed that Mellanox made in September a press release titled Virginia Tech Selects Mellanox Technology to Create the World[base ']s Largest InfiniBand Cluster: "The Virginia Tech cluster will feature 24 Mellanox 96-Port switches. Each switch has 1.92 Terabits of bandwidth that enable this cluster with over 44 Terabits of total bandwidth."
|