while trying not to feel anything at this moment and getting back to concentrating on finishing this website design so I can get the money for all the work..lets look for a moment at the boy with shoes' concept of counting via base prime
in his example of 64135, that would translate to: (6 * 7) + (4 * 5) + (1 * 3) + (3 * 2) + (5 * 1)
what I don't get in his structure of "base Prime, instead of using a fixed increment between signifigant digits, each digit represents the next prime number" especially in his sample above because he's not using the next prime increment in his example,
wouldn't it be (6 * 7) + (4 * 5) + (1 * 2) + (3 * 5) + (5 * 7)
unless he's saying that (6 * 7) = 13, (4*5) = 20, (1*2) = 2, (3*5) = 15 and (5*7) = 35 but 20, 2, 15 and 35 aren't prime numbers and it doesn't work in his example either: (6 * 7) = 13, (4*5) = 20, (1*3) = 3, (3*2) = 6 and (5*1) = 5 because 20 still isn't a prime number and neither is 6
I'm confused, it doesn't make sense in his example. The boy with the shoes needs to explain his example!!
It does however make complete sense in the concept/theory/idea of counting in base prime.
x x e numbers
9:16:42 PM
|