Rumours abound that Longhorn is now scheduled to ship in 2007 rather than 2006. What with the fact that has already been emasculated, this latest rumour if it is true is a huge embarrassment to Microsoft. Jim Allchin took umbrage at the "Shorthorn" label saying it was "derogatory", what will he now respond?
It seems my "Microsoft Osbourning itself" quip is looking more and more like a believable situation.
Further thoughts:
I thought Mooing for Longhorn hoopla had completely died down -- looks like with good reason. All the "evangelism", all the promised "in the Longhorn timeframe" fixes and changes and promises look sillier and sillier now.
I have seen a number of failed computing projects in my years -- and this one has all the trappings and smell of just such a project:
- huge expectations -- encouraged and pushed but never met
- constant schedule delays
- balkanization of developed technology in an attempt to salvage the pieces
If Microsoft has truly bet the farm on Longhorn (as they have proudly indicated in the past) shareholders should really be worried.