Steve's No Direction Home Page :
If he needs a third eye, he just grows it.
Updated: 10/23/2004; 12:38:42 PM.

 

Subscribe to "Steve's No Direction Home Page" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 
 


Saturday, December 13, 2003

Aliens Cause Global Warning

This is a very interesting talk Michael Chrichton gave at CalTech in early 2003 about the perils of consensus science. He relates several instances of bad science becoming common belief --SETI, second-hand smoke, population warnings, etc. And he also mentions cases where good science ran against the consensus; including plate tectonics and some others. Good stories all, and he raises valid complaints. But his proposed solution to the problem is pretty scary in itself.

Sooner or later, we must form an independent research institute in this country. It must be funded by industry, by government, and by private philanthropy, both individuals and trusts. The money must be pooled, so that investigators do not know who is paying them. The institute must fund more than one team to do research in a particular area, and the verification of results will be a foregone requirement: teams will know their results will be checked by other groups. In many cases, those who decide how to gather the data will not gather it, and those who gather the data will not analyze it. If we were to address the land temperature records with such rigor, we would be well on our way to an understanding of exactly how much faith we can place in global warming, and therefore what seriousness we must address this.

It sounds good, but would these guardians of knowledge have even deigned to look at plate tectonics? Even if they don't know where their money's coming from, wouldn't societal pressures influence what cases they take on? It seems to me that he's just replacing "consensus" with something that sounds different, but could instead be accepted truth? It's not hard to imagine this becoming kind of a Lysenkoism. Is a group of official guardians of truth really a solution to anything?



11:02:23 AM  Permalink  comment []



Our Enemies at Home. America faces a serious threat from domestic terrorists. By Daniel Levitas. [New York Times: Opinion]
And guess what: they aren't leftists, environmentalists, black panthers. They're on the right, but American's bought and paid for right wing press won't tell us about them.

9:27:29 AM  Permalink  comment []



Bush's Secrets. "The Bush administration has removed from the public domain millions of pages of information on health, safety, and environmental matters, lowering a shroud of secrecy over many critical operations of the federal government." "A five-month investigation by U.S. News and World Report details a series of initiatives by administration officials... [Taegan Goddard's Political Wire]
9:20:03 AM  Permalink  comment []



The Supreme Court abandons the Constitution in favor of the latest fad. [OpinionJournal]
It's not hard to have mixed feelings about recent campaign finance laws. On the one hand,  anything limiting free speech is to be frowned upon. On the other, it's hard to correlate money with speech. But the funny thing about this Journal editorial is their rank hyprocisy about the Supreme Court. When the courts overturn laws, they're accused of being activists; when they uphold laws they're accused of abandoning the constitution.

9:18:23 AM  Permalink  comment []



Robert Heinlein ’s mind moved in space, time, and politics: from Upton Sinclair to Barry Goldwater, from Hollywood to a visionary future... [Arts & Letters Daily]
Short review of Heinlein's first novel, to be published in January.

9:07:07 AM  Permalink  comment []

© Copyright 2004 Steve Michel.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


December 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Nov   Jan

      EV