Updated: 9/1/03; 2:42:25 PM.
Ed Foster's Radio Weblog
        

Tuesday, August 05, 2003

Should the interests of customers be taken into account in a corporate acquisition? Many readers answered this question by referring to their own experience.

"The great danger in this situation is the impact it can have on your (IT) staff," wrote one reader who recalled when Computer Associates acquired a critical vendor for his previous company. "The migration was so painful most of us wound up leaving, so they brought in almost a whole new staff. When in turned out they couldn't make the CA stuff work either, the company ultimately had to drop CA … and basically start over. Naturally, that meant just about 100 percent turnover in the staff once again."

Some readers thought an Oracle takeover of PeopleSoft might not be that bad. "I'll stick my two cents in here because I have experienced one of these acquisitions," wrote another reader. "As long as there are enough PeopleSoft users who will stick with the product, Oracle will maintain it. Why? Because nearly every PeopleSoft user is paying about 20% of the original purchase price as an annual maintenance fee. Oracle wants that money. No Oracle support, no renewal of maintenance, no revenue for Oracle. Any attempt by Oracle to strongarm a migration will result in evaluations of other packages. Can Oracle really be arrogant enough to believe that more than 10% or 20% of the PeopleSoft users would choose to switch their software?"

Most agreed that it's not just shareholders who have a stake that should be taken into consideration. "Not just customers, but employees should also be figured into the equation," wrote another reader. "The laws in this country support the notion that corporate boards of directors are responsible only to the shareholders. To that extent, it's a sensible philosophy. What is or should be open to debate is the nature of that responsibility. When I buy shares in a company, I'm not looking to get a fast buck from it being sold. That's speculating, not investing. Rather, I'm expecting the company to generate reasonable returns on my investment for the long term. Any acquisition has three sets of stakeholders: the shareholders of both companies, the customers of both companies, and the employees of both companies. If any one of these is not taken into proper consideration, the acquisition will ultimately fail in one way or another -- lost customers, lost profits, or whatever."


11:16:17 AM    comment []

© Copyright 2003 Ed Foster.
 
August 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Jul   Sep


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "Ed Foster's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.