|  
 
   
    |   | Tuesday, December 17, 2002 | 
 |  
  
    |  | 
  
    | The Intellectual Origins Of America-Bashing: "America-bashing is anti-Americanism at its most radical and totalizing. Its goal is not to advise, but to condemn; not to fix, but to destroy. It repudiates every thought of reform in any normal sense; it sees no difference between American liberals and American conservatives; it views every American action, both present and past, as an act of deliberate oppression and systemic exploitation. It is not that America went wrong here or there; it is that it is wrong root and branch. The conviction at the heart of those who engage in it is really quite simple: that America is an unmitigated evil, an irredeemable enormity." [From the Desktop of Dane Carlson] [Counterpoint]
 
A long article, not too well written, but it offers an interesting idea. The author claims that the hatred leftists have for America comes from a fantasy world-view they've adopted as a way to cling to Marxism.9:16:12 PM
   |  |  
  
    | Vatican backs GM foods. The Vatican says GM foods should be used to feed the world's hungry.
 
A spokesman says the controversy over altered foods is more political than scientific. 
Archbishop Renato Martino says it is better people eat GM foods than eat grass. [Ananova] 
The irony of the Catholic Church speaking in favor of science and technology is pretty amazing. That's quite an accomplishment for the ecofreaks--they've managed to make the Vatican look enlightened.3:30:16 PM
   |  |  
  
    | Bush gives go-ahead to missile defence. The US president backs the deployment of a national missile defence system by 2004, days after the failure of the latest anti-missile test. [BBC News | Front Page | UK Edition]
 
Makes the system sound awfully unreliable, doesn't it? However, buried way down at the bottom of the article is this detail: 
 There have been eight tests of interceptor missiles so far - three have failed. 
Or in other words, over half the tests have succeeded. Now, if I had a choice between being defended by a system that works over half the time or not being defended at all, I know which I'd choose. But then, I'm not a liberal.9:44:46 AM
   |  |  |  
 
             
 
               
                |   | © Copyright 
                  2006
                  Ken Hagler. Last update: 
                  2/14/2006; 6:57:20 PM.
 |  | 
             
 
 
  Email
 |