|
|
Friday, December 13, 2002 |
New Scientist. Scientists make eggregious citation errors in published papers that mushroom in their effect. This wouldn't have happened if these papers were published to the Web (open to interconnection) and had a peer review process like Weblogs do. Make a lousy link and a couple of people will call you on it in a less than a few hours after posting it. [John Robb's Radio Weblog]
This does not come as a surprised, but a lot of the mistakes are actually not committed by the scientist. They are actually embedded in the way citations are counted which is neither scientific not very efective, just a self serving enterprise with a scientific sounding name...
9:46:07 PM
|
|
Since the strike started I had had few good days. Today was one. My friend Sumito Estévez spent the day at my place with his wife. While our children played we enjoyed a grown up conversation. Good food and wine was a plenty. What a nice change of pace!
7:28:03 PM
|
|
© Copyleft 2005 Alfredo Octavio.
|
|
|
|