|
Wednesday, July 14, 2004 |
Libraries Have Nothing to Fear [about RSS] but Fear Itself. Fear of RSS
"However, whether or not to use RSS on your site should no longer be
an option. I believe it has become a necessity if you wish to compete
with others in your industry....
For many users today, bookmarks have become useless since we have
too many of them. Bookmarks allow for information overload just as
easily as RSS does, but the difference is that RSS allows updates
through all that information overload. A bookmark gets hidden, but if
you update your site then the RSS feed will reflect that and tell the
reader its time to view the content....
With the plethora of sites around fighting for the mindshare of your
readers becomes essential. Why lessen your chances by not including a
RSS feed? That opens the gates for everyone else to increase their
readership. RSS feeds create more opportunities and the advantages
outweigh the disadvantages." [BusinessLogs, via del.icio.us/tag/rss] [The Shifted Librarian]
10:23:32 AM Google It!.
|
|
Bloglines : RSS as Blogger : Blogging. IE's Failings Point Way to RSS
"Opinion: When Microsoft abandoned Internet Explorer development to
concentrate on fixing the browser's security vulnerabilities, it opened
the door to the emerging RSS revolution. ....
Pluck's Trojan horse strategy underlines the profoundly disruptive
nature of the RSS transformation. The synchronization genie, once out
of the bottle, will act as an accelerant for RSS client market share as
a percentage of overall browser usage. At some point, perhaps as early
as Inauguration Day, IE—and the Web—will be subsumed by the RSS
platform. " [eWeek, via Scripting News]
One of the major catalysts of the RSS revolution was the introduction of Bloglines.
Free and web-based, it's far and away the best choice for newbies, and
it's easy to center a class or tutorial around it. What innovations
will we see in the next six months that will be the next great leap?
And will your library be able to participate in the revolution?
I am happy to report that my home library will be. More when I can show it! [The Shifted Librarian]
10:22:04 AM Google It!.
|
|
The archiving option is here now and costs less. Stevan Harnad, Les Carr, and Steve Hitchcock, Letter to the Editor on Open Access,
The Independent, July 14, 2004. Excerpt: "Publishers could convert
their journals to an OA business model, so that rather than the
user-institution paying the publication costs per journal subscribed
to, they are paid by the author-institution, per article published.
However, out of the 24,000 journals published today, only 5 per cent
have so far made the transition to become open access journals, whereas
around 80 per cent allow authors to make OA copies of their own
articles. The only difference between the publishers therefore is that
Springer offers authors the choice of paying for OA, and Reed Elsevier
does not. But authors who want the benefits of OA now do not have to
wait until they can pay their publishers to provide it for them. They
can already do it themselves with a few keystrokes, for free, today." [Open Access News]
9:44:34 AM Google It!.
|
|
© Copyright 2004 Bruce Landon.
|