|
Saturday, July 17, 2004 |
Peeer review and open access. Tracey Brown et al., Peer Review and the acceptance of new scientific ideas,
Sence About Science, June 24, 2004. A thorough exploration of peer
review, particularly to help the public understand the process and
learn to ask the right questions about controversial research results.
For brief overviews, see the publisher's announcement and press release.
The report endorses open access in several ways. For example, when
"commercially generated scientific findings" must be disclosed prior to
peer review, e.g. to prevent insider trading, then they should be
accompanied by open-access data files to help researchers assess the
reported findings (pp. xii, 28). OA journals may change the way they
manage peer review but will not change the principle of peer review (p.
21). Self-archiving has created a new outlet for peer-reviewed articles
(pp. 21-22). "Open Access may even increase the extent to which science
is self-corrective because all qualified experts will be able to access
all published papers" (p. 22). [Open Access News]
9:20:45 AM Google It!.
|
|
© Copyright 2004 Bruce Landon.
|