|
Monday, July 19, 2004 |
UK House committee releases its report on open access. About 90 minutes ago, the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee
released the long-awaited report on its inquiry into journal prices and
open access, Scientific Publications: Free for All? Here's my summary
of the major recommendations:
- The government should provide funds for all UK universities to launch open-access institutional repositories.
- Authors of articles based on government-funded research should deposit copies in their institutional repositories.
- The government should appoint a "central body" to oversee the
launch of the institutional repositories, their networking needs, and
their compliance with "technical standards needed to provide maximum
functionality" (presumably the OAI metadata harvesting protocol).
- The government should create a fund to help authors pay the
processing fees charged by open-access journals. The committee is not
yet ready to endorse the upfront funding model for OA journals (which
it calls the "author-pays" model), but wants to create such a fund in
order to promote further experimentation with the model.
- The government should develop a wider, long-term open-access strategy, including open-access journals, "as a matter of urgency".
- Universities should develop their "capacity to manage" the copyrights that faculty will increasingly retain in the future.
- These steps can and should be undertaken without jeopardizing "rigorous and independent peer review".
- The government should fund the British Library to take on the long-term preservation of digital scholarship.
- Because the market for science and scholarship is
international, the government should "act as a proponent for change on
the international stage and lead by example".
The full report (a 118 page PDF file) will soon be available at the committee's page of reports. (It's still night time in England.) In a posting to SOAF,
I've quoted extensively from the report's conclusions and
recommendations, for those who don't have time to read the full report.
[Open Access News]
7:12:22 PM Google It!.
|
|
Downloading for Democracy.
Peer-to-peer networks aren't just for trading music and movies. A law
student, frustrated by government secrecy and possible conflicts of
interest, launches a website that uses P2P networks to distribute
telling government documents. By Kim Zetter. [Wired News] disruptive technology on the move -- BL
10:03:27 AM Google It!.
|
|
More on the NIH OA plan. Andrea Foster, House Committee Tells NIH to Post Research Results Online and Make Them Free,
Chronicle of Higher Education, July 19, 2004 (accessible only to
subscribers). Excerpt: "In a coup for the open-access movement, the
Appropriations Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives has
recommended that the National Institutes of Health provide the public
with free, online access to articles resulting from research it has
financed. The recommendation is included in a report that accompanies a
spending bill for the Departments of Labor, Education, and Health and
Human Services for the 2005 fiscal year. The report says that within
six months after an article is published, the NIH should make available
researchers' final manuscripts via PubMed Central, a popular digital
archive maintained by the National Library of Medicine. The Association
of American Publishers is aggressively pressing members of Congress to
gut the open-access language in the report, saying that the
recommendation is worded like a requirement and would threaten
publishers' ability to decide when and if to make articles free." [Open Access News]
9:15:59 AM Google It!.
|
|
More on Google indexing of OAI-compliant archives. Kinley Levack, A Giant Leap for Academia? Google Ventures into DSpace, EContent,
EContent, July/August, 2004. Excerpt: "DSpace is open-source software
designed to assist colleges and universities in creating, managing, and
maintaining digital repositories. There are currently about 125 schools
using this software, but no tool existed that enabled searching across
repositories instead of just within them. [PS: Untrue, but these tools
are not as popular or comprehensive as Google.] Enter Google into
DSpace. Google and 17 partner schools have joined forces on a pilot
program to enable searching among DSpace repositories....Although both
sides have been tight lipped about the project, representatives from
DSpace have commented that the agreement with Google is not exclusive
and that they are open to working with other search engine companies or
even developing their own technology. Plans with Google continue to
move forward, though, and if all goes well with the pilot, then Google
may launch the program under its Advanced Search section within the
next few months." [Open Access News]
9:14:12 AM Google It!.
|
|
© Copyright 2004 Bruce Landon.
|