How We All Lost $500,000 or "The True Costs of Echo"
I was just thinking over the whole Echo / New RSS format issues and here's what I thought:
- There's no way that RSS .9x / 2.0 is going away. It is too entrenched and will just be around for a long time. Think of it as "the ASCII of syndication". So every vendor that is involved in Syndication will have to support it. Maybe completely new vendors can escape it but anyone who sells a product or provides a service that does RSS now will have to support it for the indefinite future. Say 3 more years at least.
- Let's say that there are 50 vendors out there that support RSS and now also need to support echo. Let's also take an arbitrary cost estimate to the vendor of $10,000. Assuming a fully loaded cost of $100 / hour for a software engineer to do the implementation, document it, etc, that's only 100 hours of labor or 2.5 weeks. And that just isn't that much time when you come down to it. Sure I did my first RSS implementation for Feedster in less than a day but after bug fixes? I'm probably every bit of that. Now this could be high or could be low but let's assume that it is good.
- That means the cost of Echo is $500,000*.
Hm.... That $500,000 could do quite a bit of good in the world. It could give Dave Jacobs a new kidney. Or it could do a lot of other good. So the question that comes to mind is this:
Is Echo Worth $500,000 ?
*And don't forget that we all still have to pay for supporting existing RSS, fixing bugs, adapting it to new conventions, etc.
When:
4:09:47 PM |
Permalink: |
|
IM Me About This
|
|