|
 |
Monday, February 10, 2003 |
La belle trouvaille (Downes)! Un article bourré de références pertinentes et de conseils pour stimuler l'interaction asynchrones entre participants à un cours en ligne. Certains constats rejoignent également nos propres observations, par exemple à l'effet que les forums de discussion associés aux cours en ligne ont tendance à ne pas « lever » à moins d'incitatifs précis et, lorsque ce n'est pas le cas, la communication s'y avère parfois de qualité inférieure ou monopolisée par un noyau d'utilisateurs. Trop de références et de bon contenu : je me le réserve.
Supporting Peer to Peer Interaction in Web-based Courses. Another excellent contribution from the people at the City University of Hong Kong. This well-researched article looks at and challenges your perceptions about communication in online courses. What would you say, for example, of a study that shows that the most popular part of a WebCT course is the discussion board, even though fewer than half the messages were on-task? And suppose the same study showed that the provision of online support did not significantly reduce the dropout? This article looks at a few more studies, then highlights a set of problem areas in course-based interaction. By Graeme Daniel and Kevin Cox, Web Tools Newsletter, February 10, 2003 [Refer]
10:04:00 PM
|
|
© Copyright 2003 Robert Gregoire.
|
|
|
|
February 2003 |
Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
|
Jan Mar |
|
|