| |
 |
Thursday, July 5, 2007 |
CommonDreams: "President Bush this month is giving an obscure White House office new powers over regulations affecting health, worker safety and the environment. Calling it a power grab, Democrats running Congress are intent on stopping him.
The House voted last week to prohibit the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs from spending federal money on Executive Order 13422, signed by Bush last January and due to take effect July 24.
The order requires federal officials to show that private companies, people or institutions failed to address a problem before agencies can write regulations to tackle it. It also gives political appointees greater authority over how the regulations are written.
The House measure 'stops this president or any president from seizing the power to rewrite almost every law that Congress passes, laws that protect public health, the environment, safety, civil rights, privacy and on and on,' said Rep. Brad Miller, D-N.C., its sponsor."
AlterNet: "When the White House invoked executive privilege, it wasn't invoking anything in the Constitution.
Nowhere does the Constitution mention the term or the concept of executive privilege. The belief that it does, the late legal historian Raoul Berger once said, is one of the greatest 'constitutional myths'."
RawStory: "A group of progressive and Democratic activists in California will be using the July 4 holiday to inaugurate a nerve center that will work to bring more Congress members around to supporting the impeachment of President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. The Impeachment Center's opening comes as one House Democrat took aim at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's statement that impeachment remained 'off the table'."
Democrats like Pelosi are crypto-republicans. They condone the abuse of power.
10:55:59 AM 
|
|
Scotsman: "Some of the terrorist suspects arrested over the Glasgow and London car bombs were known to MI5 before last week's attacks, The Scotsman has learned.
At least two of the names of people now under arrest and other details, including mobile-phone numbers, were recorded in security-service databases before last Thursday.
Security sources said last night that searches of MI5 files showed some of those arrested had 'connections' to suspected extremists previously monitored by the security services.
However, the same sources insist there was nothing in the files before last Thursday to suggest that any of those now arrested were involved in terrorism."
All this is very weird. Why were these people followed if they were not involved in terrorism? Why were they allowed to plant those cars in London?
It doesn't add up. Years ago there was a similar case and the 'suspects' were never charged. And these amateurs, 'suspects', are supposed to be linked to 'suspected extremists'?
It's all very 'suspect', indeed.
10:45:58 AM
|
|
© Copyright 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
