STRAIGHT TRACK : Intercraft Communications for Reality-Based Rails
Updated: 5/25/2005; 4:42:47 PM.

 


LINKS


ARCHIVES

Subscribe to "STRAIGHT TRACK" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

Friday, March 11, 2005

We stand corrected. In the post below we claimed NCCC representatives walked out of the latest bargaining session with the RLBC. Turns out that the RLBC walked but only after it became apparent that the NCCC wasn't prepared to take them and their bargaining ground rules seriously. BMWE issues a bargaining update that describes the meeting.

"After a short break, the NCCC responded by rejecting categorically all of our proposed ground rules. According to Mr. Allen, the proposed ground rules were "silly" and the carriers were not interested in establishing any ground rules for the conduct of the bargaining. In essence, the carriers' position was that unless the RLBC was willing to meet at the carriers' convenience, discuss only matters the carriers wanted to discuss and be provided only information the carriers thought was necessary for bargaining, there was no point in meeting. The RLBC found no good reason to continue the meeting in light of the carriers' utter refusal to discuss any type of ground rules to govern the negotiations."


6:48:11 PM    feedback []  trackback []   Google It!

Apparently feeling it holds the upper hand when it comes to negotiating with rail labor, the National Carriers' Conference Committee (NCCC) prematurely ended negotiations with the newly formed Rail Labor Bargaining Coalition (RLBC) yesterday, refusing to even discuss a few simple ground rules. Guess rules are for fools. From the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employee Division (BMWE) of the IBT comes a report:

Rail Carriers' Outright Rejection of Rail Labor's
Proposed "Ground Rules" Derails Negotiations

(Washington, DC) - The second bargaining session over changes in wages and
work rules of the national rail carriers concluded prematurely yesterday when the
National Carriers Conference Committee (NCCC), representing the Class One carriers,
refused to entertain or even discuss ground rules for negotiations proposed
by the Rail Labor Bargaining Coalition (RLBC), representing seven rail unions
comprised of 85,000 rail workers. The RLBC proposed the ground rules after
questions regarding the bargaining process were raised at the first negotiating
session, held 1/24/2005. At yesterday's meeting, the rail carriers' chief negotiator,
Robert Allen, said, "There will be no ground rules for these negotiations."

MORE

The proposed Ground Rules covered the following issues:

-Who each side represented;
-Who would participate in negotiations;
-The advance notification of presentations by experts;
-The scheduling of negotiations;
-The alignment of common and craft-specific issues so the suitable
 representatives would be available;
-Mutually agreeing upon negotiation locations and provisions for bargaining
 and caucus rooms and the sharing of expenses;
-Provisions for information sharing and confidentiality agreements;
-The finalization of contract language and the process for the ratification of
 the contract by the members of the coalition.


4:25:10 PM    feedback []  trackback []   Google It!

Dated Monday, March 7, 2005, comes the DOT FRA Standards for Development and Use of Processor-Based Signal and Train Control Systems: Final Rule.

From the Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 43, Page 11052

49 CFR Parts 209, 234, and 236

[Docket No. FRA-2001-10160]

RIN 2130-AA94

AGENCY: Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: FRA is issuing a performance
standard for the development and use of
processor-based signal and train control
systems. The rule also covers systems
which interact with highway-rail grade-crossing
warning systems. The rule
establishes requirements for notifying
FRA prior to installation and for
training and recordkeeping. FRA is
issuing these standards to promote the
safe operation of trains on railroads
using processor-based signal and train
control equipment.

DATES: This rule is effective June 6,
2005. The incorporation by reference of
a certain publication listed in the rule
is approved by the Director of the
Federal Register as of June 6, 2005.

********************************

The report indicates that
substantial public benefits would likely
flow from the installation of PTC
systems on the railroad system,
although the total amount of these
benefits is subject to debate. The report
reaffirmed the conclusions reached in
the 1994 and 2000 PTC Reports that the
safety benefits of PTC systems are
relatively small in comparison to the
huge costs of installing the PTC systems.
In light of the cost/benefit numbers,
an immediate regulatory mandate for
PTC could not be currently justified
based upon normal cost/benefit
principles relying on direct railroad
safety benefits. FRA has, therefore,
chosen to issue a final rule that
establishes a performance standard for
processor-based train control systems,
but does not require that they be
installed.

**********************************

Section 236.927 Training Specific to
Locomotive Engineers and Other
Operating Personnel

This section specifies minimum
training requirements for locomotive
engineers and other operating personnel
who interact with processor-based train
control systems. "Other operating
personnel" is intended to refer to on-board
train and engine crew members
(i.e., conductors, brakemen, and
assistant engineers). FRA invited
comments addressing the issue of
whether a formal definition is needed
for "other operating personnel." FRA
received no comment on the term and
has decided to leave it undefined.


12:02:56 AM    feedback []  trackback []   Google It!

© Copyright 2005 The Usual Suspect.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


March 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Feb   Apr


A picture named ROCULogo.jpg







PAST POSTS

2005/05

2005/042005/032005/022004/122004/092004/082004/072004/062004/052004/042004/032004/022004/012003/122003/11