2004¦~10¤ë22¤é | |
You can use callto://tzechienchu/ to call me by skype. Nice design. Skype. 5:10:51 PM |
Apple, Jobs up for four Billboard Digital Awards. Music industry trade journal Billboard on Thursday announced the finalists for the first annual Billboard Digital Entertainment Awards, to be held Nov. 5 in Los Angeles. The publication noted that the 26 categories involve games, music, film, television and video, with recognition of "the cutting-edge developments and forward thinkers shaping the future of entertainment." Apple CEO and co-founder Steve Jobs is up for Visionary of the Year -- pitting him against HDNet chairman and Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, Real Networks chairman and CEO Rob Glaser and Sim City and The Sims designer Will Wright -- while his company will vie for Innovator of the Year, Brand of the Year and Best Downloadable or Subscription Music Service. [MacCentral News] 2:50:02 PM |
LaCie offers 800GB Ethernet Disk, external SATA drive [The Macintosh News Network] 9:56:19 AM |
Apple, Jobs nominated for Billboard Digital awards [The Macintosh News Network] 9:48:29 AM |
Humans Aren't So Complicated. New research reveals that humans have only about 25,000 genes instead of the 100,000 originally guessed. Researchers scratch their heads. By Kristen Philipkoski. [Wired News] 9:47:34 AM |
PalmSource Settles Patent Suit with Digeo
Digeo, the Paul Allen-backed maker of software and services for digital cable TV, successfully settled last Friday a patent infringement suit with PalmSource, makers of the PalmOS operating system for handheld devices. The patent at issue was U.S. Patent No. 5,734,823, "Systems and apparatus for electronic communication and storage of information," granted in 1998. Financial terms of the settlement were not disclosed, but as is typical in patent settlements, PalmSource now has a license to that and related patents.
Digeo's patent covers a method of distributing digital content through a point-of-sale device called a "Book Bank," which is a point-of-sale repository for digital content that can be used to sell content to consumers, encrypt it, and download it to their devices. The patent was originally assigned to Microtome, a now-defunct developer of e-book technology. There are various aspects of the patent that relate to DRM, including dynamic packaging (including encryption) of content items on downloading, usage restrictions such as expiration times, and e-commerce. Although the term "Book Bank" is used, the patent is nonspecific about the form of the content.
Although we suspect that the magnitude of this settlement does not equal that of the US $440 Million that Microsoft paid to InterTrust in April 2004 to settle infringement claims related to DRM and other patents, this is certainly not going to be the last we hear of DRM-related patent litigation. In fact, we believe it's just getting started. The essential problem is that most of the seminal IP related to DRM was applied for in the mid-'90s (Digeo's patent was filed in '96) and granted in the late '90s, while DRM did not become significant as a market until perhaps 2002 -- which, incidentally, is when Digeo acquired the '823 patent.
One important effect of the time lag is that the terminologies used in the patents, the architectures on which they are based, and the applications to which the patents were intended to apply may not resemble the terminologies, architectures, and applications of DRM today. (For example, merely going to the US Patent & Trademark Office website and searching on "digital rights management" would not be very fruitful.) IP related to today's DRM implementations, therefore, tends to come from a variety of sources, some of them unexpected.
Digeo's '823 patent is a good example of this: it describes a system for distributing what we today would call e-books, and elements of DRM happen to be part of it: for example, the box marked "data conversion" in a functional architecture diagram in the patent has aspects that resemble a DRM packaging function.
MPEG LA's recent call for patents is a noble attempt to create some order out of what is undoubtedly an increasing mess, but its success is not assured. It is focusing its activity on implementations of the Open Mobile Alliance standards (OMA DRM 1 and 2), and its success depends critically on all of the core IP holders in the DRM space agreeing to participate and on all parties concurring with the outcome. Meanwhile, other standards bodies are appearing (e.g,. the Coral and Secure Video Processor consortia), and IP licensing authorities may come into existence around those as well, and furthermore, we hear about previously unknown individual sources of DRM-related IP -- both new and old -- on a regular basis.
Patent holders deserve to be compensated by implementers of their inventions, but the current situation in the DRM market is going to get a whole lot worse before it gets better. For all the talk about legislation (such as the Induce Act) threatening to put dampers on innovation, there ought to be just as much talk about how the proliferation of patent claims could present similar problems, as implementers of content delivery systems scratch their heads over what IP they need to license, how much it's going to cost, and whether unforeseen litigation lurks around the corner. The more rationality that is brought to the process, the better for implementers and IP holders alike -- and the more efficiently the industry can develop. 9:30:14 AM |
Macromedia breathed new life into a largely overlooked Web technology on Monday when the company announced its acquisition of FutureWave Software for an undisclosed sum. Despite a high-profile foray with the Simpsons Web site for the Microsoft Network, FutureSplash Animator has not exactly become a household name among Web surfers. Enter Macromedia. "It was time to team with a company that had the marketing prowess," acknowledged Charles Jackson, founder of San Diego, California-based FutureWave. 9:24:20 AM |