Lately I am thinking quite a bit about some impressions that I
gathered during my (unhealthy?) conference marathon (Ed-Media 2004,
I-Know '04 and BlogTalk 2.0). I cannot help it ... but loads of people
still appear to be obsessed with problems and questions around
"content" or "content delivery." Learning objects here, instructional design patterns there... oh, and then let's not forget about ontologies (when and why did the tech folks nick this term from philosophy?).
The thing is... I don't think I have a content problem. And if I think
about young adults in higher education in the so-called first world, I
don't see much of a content problem, either. You want to learn
about something? Well, there is the city library, there is the
university library, there is the university library network, there are
bookshops, there are online-bookshops, there is Google, there are
Web-forums, there are Weblogs, there are community colleges, CDs, TV,
movies, radio... and so forth. In fact there is so much quality stuff
out there that I have a hard time to believe that the world will be a
better place if we only add repositories of digital learning objects to
this bewildering landscape. So, I keep asking myself: what is
wrong with you? everybody else seems to be really concerned about
quality content and its delivery... what kind of distorted mental world
are you living in? Then, yesterday I read the article Cybernetics, e-learning and the education system of Oleg Liber from the Bolton Institute of Higher Education, UK. Oleg writes... For universities especially this inability to exploit the powerful new discursive
capabilities of the internet is of concern. As Diana Laurillard points out [24], higher
learning is concerned with worldviews, with the acquisition of the concepts and
distinctions of a discipline, its discourse; and this is best learnt through practice, though
engaging in the discourse. This requires a form of cognitive apprenticeship [25], where a
rich conversational engagement between learners and teacher can take place; it cannot be
achieved just through the learning of facts. The internet provides new tools to support
this, but the leading VLEs [virtual learning environments] are not exploiting them. Thus there is a mismatch between
what people are doing on the internet, and what leading learning environments are
providing. The internet empowers people by giving the possibility of control over content
and organisation; many VLEs shift the locus of control further away from learners and
teachers to institutional management... [Oleg Liber] Do you have a content problem? [Sebastian Fiedler]
|