|
|
Sunday, November 28, 2004
|
|
Inspired in part by reading up on podcasting techniques, I made the big
leap (for me) today by loading up some open-source
audio-recording/editing software (Audacity),
buying an RCA-to-miniplug cable, and recording from cassette tape to
digital audio on the PowerBook. I chose to experiment using a
recording I made from KUSP's broadcast of a John Adams piece from this year's Cabrillo Festival of Contemporary Music,
"The Dharma at Big Sur." I succeeded in digitizing the piece, then
encoding to MP3, and finally moving it to the iPod for repeat
enjoyment. And I'm happy with the result! I feel so clever, but of
course it's the folks who develop the software that makes this possible
who're clever.
8:16:57 PM
|
|
TC from the academy:
Orange: An Online Journal of Technical Communication and Information Design.
"The growing field of Technical Communication once primarily focused on
the communication of technical information through manuals and help
systems. In recent years the field has expanded to include a variety of
specialized disciplines that utilize technology to communicate -- and
has adopted much more sophisticated theories of communication to
accomodate these changes. The Orange Journal of Technical Communication
and Information Design is a graduate student journal that strives to
foster critical thinking and discussion on a wide variety of topics and
issues important to technical communicators." ( About Orange) [ InfoDesign: Understanding by Design]
I'm looking forward to reading the article in Volume 3, Number 1,
entitled "Just a Cog in the Machine? The Implications for Technical
Communicators." I often refer to myself and my coworkers as cogs, which
is what we're treated as most of the time. As opposed to thinking,
innovative, creative professionals capable of unique contributions.
8:02:51 PM
|
|
More wisdom from "The Don" at OK/Cancel:
"The Don" Reveals All: Part 3.
. .
The most important consulting rule that I follow is: "Never solve the
problem as stated." Why? because it is invariably the wrong problem,
usually being the symptom rather than the cause. Find the root cause
and solve that, and then the original problem usually disappears. .
. By askdon@ok-cancel.com (Don Norman). [ OK/Cancel]
Don said the same thing at the BayDUX event last month. Which reminds
me of a technique I learned when studying constraints management (Eli Goldratt's
Theory of Constraints) in which one works back from whatever appears to
be a conclusion to find the underlying assumptions. On examining the
validity of the assumptions, we can determine if the conclusion (or
accepted fact, or problem definition) is valid. And we usually find
that it's not. Which bears some relationship to Lakoff's thinking about
politics and the framing of discussions. Look at the beliefs and
assumptions (or values) from which our positions derive, and we can
learn about how we got there.
7:51:25 PM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2002-2005 Fred Sampson.
Last update: 5/21/05; 10:24:52 PM.
|
|
Search this site:
Fred's Blogroll
What I'm Reading:
|
|