Marc's Voice -> Reply to Jeremy.
Anybody who has media on-line somewhere [can benefit from these standards efforts.] Even Macromedia and Adobe would benefit from this sort of open standard.
Adobe's Album product is a natural, as is Macromedia's ambitions to build 'rich internet applications.'
I'm gonna do a big post on this tomorrow. [via Marc's Voice]
As I keep seeing this thread I wonder whtether this is really just an evolution of existing standards that we have such as XML, XML Schema, RSS 2.0, MetaWeblog API. Better handling for streaming data types and richer semantics for binary media in MetaWeblog would be steps in the right direction. [ Jeremy Allaire's Radio]
Sorry I'm not done yet - but I thought I'd reply to Jeremy's comments:
"Yes and No".
Yes - these ideas build on RSS, XML, OPML and uses XML-RPC. But No - as far as I know there are no open standards for photo albums or media collections. Winamp's .M3U playlist format is fairly open and ubiquitous, but that's about it.
Yes - we can continue to patchquilt existing standards in a bottom-up like fashion, but we're all smart people, and there's no reason why we can't architect a 'mesh' of standards, which will not only be open and foster incredible new types of RIAs and knowledge management, but also enable new kinds of on-line communities - as well.
Once we integrate media management into blogging and personal publishing tools THEN an image can have attributes, can 'intelligent', and we'll be able to track it, and alter presentations and rendering based upon all sorts of dynamic models. But if media is just a URL, then - it's just text - for all intents and purposes.
Macromedia should participate in these OPEN standards efforts surrounding this area (I know you have contributed to other efforts) - that we all could benefit from.
No one company or entity can do it alone. The day of closed systems is over. [Marc's Voice]
7:19:52 PM
|