| |
 |
Wednesday, December 27, 2006 |
"In the aftermath of the Dec. 23 United Nations Security Council unanimous vote imposing sanctions or Iran for failing to suspend uranium enrichment, one has to wonder: why did Russia and China go along with it?"
Read more.
11:52:29 AM 
|
|
RawStory: "A liberal-bashing book by a veteran St. Louis judge is to become available publicly this week, but it is already causing a stir in political and legal circles - and prompting some to say it could cost him his job."
CarpetBaggerReport: "In a disclaimer at the end of the book, Dierker writes that the views in the book are 'personal, and should not be construed as any indication of how I would rule on any case coming before me'. No, of course not. Just because he spent nearly 300 pages explaining his beliefs that liberals and 'femifascists' are wrong about everything is certainly no reason to question his judicial independence, temperament, and impartiality, right?
Does that make any sense? A judge writes a book-length diatribe against Americans he doesn't like, but can maintain his impartiality because he knows where his biases are? Will that inspire confidence in the courtroom?"
You see, it all fits. Judge Dierker is right because everyone else is wrong. And why is everyone else wrong, because judge Dierker is right. This is justice the Murkan way, folks.
11:49:40 AM
|
|
© Copyright 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
