Michael Rogers' Star Talk Weblog
Astronomy, technology, small business, politics
 

 







 
 

 Monday, February 10, 2003


News - Nanotechnology draws more attention from scientists - but what about "nana" technology?: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/10/technology/10NANO.html



Comment - This article talks about a recent conference on nanotechnology. "Researchers suspect that the natural world's ability to assemble atoms into complex tissues with very exact specifications may hold the key to making vast quantities of minute, inexpensive pollution sensors or solar cells. Bioengineers, on the other hand, are looking to artificial nanostructures as possible drug delivery systems or as scaffolds to help injured organs repair themselves."



I just finished a book by Michael Crichton called "Prey". It was a science-fiction/horror story about nanotechnology run amok. It really was not very good. That's two books in a row from Crichton that have been disappointing. In fact, I don't think he's written a good book since Jurassic Park.



We don't need nanotechnology. Instead, we should have "nana" technology. That's where Nana Weir, Nana Rogers, etc., tell you to shape up and fly right. But "nana" technology out-of-control would be scary indeed!



Click here to see current comments and add your own.

1:13:11 PM    



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. Click to see the XML version of this web page. © Copyright 2003 Michael Rogers.
Last update: 3/3/03; 12:31:17 PM.
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


 

February 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28  
Jan   Mar