Cable TV is very interesting business. Essentially a semi-regulated monopoly, it is beginning to receive a major challenge from satellite providers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/12/technology/circuits/12SATE.html
As a member of my township's (suburban New Jersey) cable tv committee for nearly two years, I have been astonished at the arrogance of the local provider. An unwillingness to provide good value to many of its consumers has resulted in a major shift to satellite providers. Two informal counts now show over twenty percent of the residents using satellite cable fueled by poor performance of the cable system, increasing bills and programming (mostly sports) issues.
At one time I believed the major asset of the cable company was their broadband connection, but our surveys indicate that most of the town's residents lack an interest in cable modems. At last count about 15 percent had a broadband connection and that was split between DSL and cable (cable modem service came late to the area). One of the satellite providers is now bundling DSL service to serve the net hungry population. In any event I doubt that broadband Internet will move past fifty percent penetration until it falls to AOL price levels and, even then, it will probably have to be an AOL or MSN branded service.
I was astonished at the quality of the image on satellite tv compared with the local cable service. It may be that higher quality cable plant would produce similar images, but that doesn't exist locally.
If the barrier of dish installation (particularly in apartments and condos) didn't exist my guess is our area would have greater than fifty percent satellite penetration.
One wonders if the local cable provider will ever get their act together.
2:50:45 AM
|