RSS, long and short entries
Jonathon Delacour had a
lot of interesting stuff to say about weblog entries, be they brief or extended, and about the corresponding RSS feeds. Several people added comments about his piece. One small snippet:
The answer seems simple: offer the option to publish the title but not the content to RSS. Michael points to a side benefit: "It would give the art of writing headlines a whole new life."
This sounds like a reasonable option, but I'd really prefer the RSS reading software to allow me to decide how much of the text of a given RSS feed I'd like to see. Joe's comment on Jonathon's piece put it this way:
The ability to summarize, abstract or otherwise trim long content from an RSS feed is just an option I as a user should be looking for when I choose my software.
I use weblogs.com-on-the-desktop more often than I read the News/RSS page. It allows me to visit the sites of interest -- it seems somehow more respectful of the site author, and gives me a more visual mental picture. But there are two w.c-o-t-d behaviors that I'd like to improve:
One is that people's published categories appear as separate weblogs, and their titles lack context. E.g., there's one simply called webDevelopment but it's actually a category from a weblog called A Frog in the Valley. I guess what I'd like to see here is for w.c-o-t-d to be able to point out when one of its weblogs is a category, and possibly place the categories close to their parent weblogs.
The other w.c-o-t-d behavior I'd like to change is to add a way for me to go through the whole list (it's in the weblogsComData.weblogs table -- Radio users can look at it via the Windows menu -> weblogsComData.root) and put my own annotations on each member of the list. I think a small set of flags would do for the annotations:
- Don't ever show me this one again
- Haven't looked at it yet
- Already in my Favorites list
And some UI in the w.c-o-t-d window, that lets me set those flags, either per weblog or for "all the rest of the ones that I see here this hour".
More thought (and better wording) needed...
6:17:07 AM