| |
 |
Friday, April 7, 2006 |
The western mainstream media still have a problem with calling a war criminal a war criminal. Of course, they have no problem doing that for non-western countries.
Fair: "Although the evidence is ample that President Bush led the way to aggressive warfare against Iraq, the mainstream U.S. news media keep proceeding on the assumption that - when the subject is war crimes - he's well cast as an accuser but should never be viewed as an appropriate defendant."
While there are real security problems to be tackled like cancer-causing benzene in soft drinks, Bush has been endangering security on all levels.
Bush authorized the leak of sensitive intelligence information about Iraq. As usual the mainstream media tell us Bush has a right to do this. He hasn't. He deliberately endangered CIA operations and the life of personnel without any other reason than to harm the persons involved. He is personally responsible.
Bush should be impeached. He is a security risk. And the irresponsible moron has more great plans.
LATimes: "The Bush administration Wednesday unveiled a blueprint for rebuilding the nation's decrepit nuclear weapons complex, including restoration of a large-scale bomb manufacturing capacity."
A retired CIA official says Bush is a war criminal and should be tried for crimes against humanity.
Contractors of the firm Aegis have been shooting civilians without warning in Iraq.
Even in the UK homeland honest civilians are victimised by a criminal system.
Independent: "Two grandmothers from Yorkshire face up to a year in prison after becoming the first people to be arrested under the Government's latest anti-terror legislation.
Helen John, 68, and Sylvia Boyes, 62, both veterans of the Greenham Common protests 25 years ago, were arrested on Saturday after deliberately setting out to highlight a change in the law which civil liberties groups say will criminalise free speech and further undermine the right to peaceful demonstration.
Under the little-noticed legislation, which came into effect last week, protesters who breach any one of 10 military bases across Britain will be treated as potential terrorists and face up to a year in jail or £5,000 fine. The protests are curtailed under the Home Secretary's Serious Organised Crime and Police Act."
BackingBlair: "As of this moment, Labour have 30 days to get rid of Blair.
Actually, they've got 'less' than 30 days to get rid of Blair... because if Blair is still in power on Thursday 4th May 2006, we WILL NOT VOTE LABOUR."
11:58:40 AM 
|
|
© Copyright 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
