Salon has a feature on the sniper subculture of the NRA in their premium section.
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/10/16/sniping/index.html
I really wonder if the framers of the Constitution would accept ultra accurate/ultra deadly weapons as "arms." It can be argued that the major danger of using a firearm in the late eighteenth century was from the infection resulting from a wound.
In any event there are enthusiasts who love super accurate/super deadly rifles
http://www.snipercountry.com/
http://www.snipersparadise.com/
For an interesting experience, call your representative and ask for their current view on gun control. You will only get a staff memberwho is generally untrained on the subject, but the conversation can be interesting - particularly if the staffer is female.
I'm sure that I'll get a position letter in the mail thanking me for my interest in public policy and for supporting the second amendment (my rep is the NJ Republican Rodney Frelinghuysen). Somehow I was once placed on an NRA mailing list after such a call.
Both parties are "respectful" (some might say afraid) of the NRA, but one seems to take dictation from the organization.
Check out the NRA site
http://www.nra.org/
Among other things they are screaming about a vote in LA that would ban .50 caliber rifles in city limits. My gosh -- how will people protect themselves from runaway hippos and elephants?
Of course, in the spirit of full disclosure, I must note that I'm biased - one of my uncles was murdered by a shooter in San Francisco.
8:27:47 AM
|